Stuart Shipko said that everyone is out to get him in a criminal report to the police, but the odd thing is he may be right

We've recently received a bizarre police criminal complaint from an anonymous source inside the Pasadena Police Department dated around June 12, 2013 in the mail, involving our favorite dishonest psychiatric quack, Dr. Stuart Lee Shipko of Pasadena.

Are some psychiatrists, like Stuart Shipko, quacks?

Apparently, on Monday, June 10 and Wednesday, June 12, 2013, Dr. Shipko received some threatening e-mails from someone making disparaging and insulting remarks about him and his wife, as the police report stated. So naturally, Shipko called the police to file a police complaint. Nothing bizarre so far.

However, when asked by the investigating Pasadena Police officer on the scene, Officer J.M. Longoria, who might have sent the threatening e-mails to him, Dr. Shipko oddly told the officer that he "normally does not bother law enforcement" about such matters, which suggests he gets these sorts of threats and harassments a lot from the general public, but he said he called the police on that particular instance because he was not familiar with the name of the person who sent the alleged threatening e-mails.

Shipko's reasoning on calling the police is quite bizarre on several levels, given the fact it's much easier for the police to arrest someone sending harassing e-mails, if they had a clue or knew who that person was, but Dr. Shipko claims he doesn't call the police if he knows who is threatening him. Very strange. This also suggests that Dr. Shipko often believes, deep down inside, that he deserves the verbal abuse and criticisms heaped up on him from his dissatisfied clientele.

Stuart Shipko testifies in kidnapping case and claims assailant was 'unconscious' when he methodically planned out and researched the crime for 6 months

How much of an embarrassment is Pasadena psychiatrist Stuart Shipko to the profession of psychiatry?

Dr. Stuart Shipko has no training in forensic psychiatry
which may explain why he has a professional reputation
of incompetence among colleagues

Well, if his so-called "forensic work" in psychiatry in the public record is any indication of his character and competence, then not only does he not appear to know what he is talking about as a psychiatrist, but it appears he will sell out his integrity to the highest bidder to try to give credence to any criminal defendant claiming a drug-induced "state of unconsciousness" plea.

Take for example his work in his first criminal case, The People v. Dennis Elliot Shellhouse, from August 2006 in Thousand Oaks, California. Dr. Shipko was brought in by Shellhouse's attorneys in the criminal trial in August of 2006 as a defense expert witness in psychiatry.

On June 7, 2005, Dennis Elliot Shellhouse, 46, traveled from Phenix City, Alabama to Thousand Oaks, California to carry out a kidnap-for-ransom plot on the Burtzloff family, whom at the time were residents of Lake Sherwood in Thousand Oaks.

Shellhouse posed as a courier delivering legal documents to gain entry into the gated community where the Burtzloff residence was. Once inside, he brandished a gun to threaten the victim Jamie Burtzloff, 35, in order to gain entry into her home and then subsequently threatened her housekeeper with his gun.